Saturday, March 17, 2018

Doctor on Dengvaxia: Sino ang mas may dahilan para gumawa ng paglilihis at pagkukubli?


Dengvaxia is a ticking time bomb, as some would say.
Dengvaxia product shot | Photo CTTO

In yet another occurrence of what seems to be a cover-up, a Doctor dubbed as Dengue expert showed up on the hearing concerning the anti-Dengue vaccine created by the French Pharmaceutical giant, Sanofi.

Dr. Scott Halstead, reportedly, who is based on the US Centers for Disease Control website, is an 'adjunct professor in the Department of Preventive Medicine and Biostatistics of the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences'. The said university is owned by the government of the United States of America.

A report also says that Dr. Scott Halstead was the one who founded the Pediatric Dengue Vaccine Initiative as a consultant to the Rockefeller Foundation way back 2003. As of writing, he serves as its research director and senior advisor.

There to share his inputs from an expert's point of view, Dr. Scott Halstead spoke before the Senate Blue Ribbon Committee.
Dr. Scott Halstead and Dr. Erwin Erfe | Photo CTTO

Discussing his significant take on the matter, the US Doctor said “Please be aware that the diagnosis of Dengvaxia cannot be based on an autopsy”.

“There are a lot of autopsies being done now because, of course unfortunately, children die for one reason or another after vaccine. This is a very old phenomenon. I’ve been in the vaccine business forever and there are always problems like this,” Halstead added.

On the other hand, a Filipino Moro-Lumad Doctor named Rolaiza Mimi Singayao, now living in Muscat, Oman, laid down her cards on the table as she begged to disagree with the what Halstead tried to imply.

Coming from an industry that is very relevant to the Dengvaxia mess, through a Facebook post, Singayao vented out about her stand on the controversial anti-dengue vaccine.

On one of her posts, Dr. Singayao discussed two things that Dr. Halstead pointed out during the hearing.
Photo CTTO

The factors that Halstead said the authorities have to consider prior concluding that Dengvaxia is related to the children's deaths were first '1. Unequivocal evidence that the infection was caused by dengue virus, which can be either isolation of the virus or identification of NS1' while the other is '2. awareness that the recipient was seronegative or seronegative at the time the vaccine was administered'.

The Filipina Doctor also emphasized that the parents of the children obviously have no reasons to make a fuss out of this tragic controversy.

'Walang dahilan ang PAOFT, PAO, mga batang nabakunahan, magulang, netizens, taumbayan at nagmamalasakit na mga scientists at doctors para mag imbento ng findings o data.', she wrote.

'Sino ang mas may dahilan para gumawa ng paglilihis at pagkukubli?', she added.
Photo CTTO

Check out her full post below:

Part 3.
WHY I DON'T AGREE WITH DR. SCOTT HALSTEAD

For Parts 1 and 2, read Expert disagrees with Dr. Halstead after underestimating Dengvaxia deaths: 34 deaths is never acceptable!

Dr. Halstead said 2 things have to be considered before concluding that there is a connection between the deaths of children with the Dengue vaccine.

1. Unequivocal evidence that the infection was caused by dengue virus, which can be either isolation of the virus or identification of NS1 and

2. awareness that the recipient was seronegative or seronegative at the time the vaccine was administered.

"To do that, we need to use the test that Sanofi has developed ...Halstead added."

Ang unang pamantayan ni Dr.Halstead ay kailangang may proof na may Dengue infection at kumpirmado sa blood test. Ang tanong, paano kung may epekto ang vaccine na bago, seryoso, completely iba o similar lang sa dengue infection? May mga tests po na pwedeng mag false positive o false negative ang resulta? Paano I re-reconcile ang findings?
Dr. Rolaiza Mimi Singayao | Photo CTTO

Sa number 2 naman, hindi eto nagawa bago naturukan ang mga bata umpisa March 2016 kasi nga po ang kabouhan ng Clinical Trial report ng Sanofi ay Nov. 29, 2017 na nai anunsyo kung saan ang mga hindi pa nagkaroon ng dengue infection ay maaaring magkaroon ng severe Dengue pag naturukan sa pamamagitan ng mekanismo ng antibody dependent enhancement (ADE).


Bale po, base sa sinabi ni Dr. Halstead ay hindi o lubhang mahirap ma establish ang koneksyon ng mga kaso ng kabataan sa bakuna dahil maaaring may kakulangan sa naisagawang mga tests sa mga nasawi pagkatapos nilang mabakunahan. Isa pang dahilan ay ang iba't ibang presenting complaints ng mga bata na hindi inakala na Dengue fever.

Ang key words sa message ni Dr. Halstead ay 'unequivocal evidence.'
Mataas na pamantayan sa daigdig ng mga scientists. Ngunit, may nakaligtaan nga ba na i-konsidera si Dr. Halstead? Eto ay ang mga adverse effects ng bakuna na ni report mismo ng Sanofi sa FDA noong 2015. Eto ay ang viscerotropism at neurotropism.
Former Health Secretary Janette Garin | Photo CTTO

Sabi ni Dr. Halstead na sa Yellow Fever vaccine adverse effects lang ang viscerotropism at neurotropism at hindi associated sa Dengvaxia. Nakaligtaan po marahil na eto'y documented at reported ng Sanofi mismo. At alam natin na ang Dengvaxia ay may component ng yellow fever vaccine kung kaya't hindi dapat i-discount na maaaring dagdag sa severe Dengue ay may adverse effects eto na multiple organ failure at side effects sa brain at spine.

Kung ano pa yong mga tests na hindi nagawa sa mga bata bago naturukan at maaaring hindi nagawa dahil sa iba't ibang clinical course o limitasyon sa pasilidad ay sya namang kabilang sa 2 'unequivocal evidence' ni Dr. Halstead.

Ibig sabihin po ba nito'y naitaob na ang kaso ng mga bata?

Hindi po. Ang matibay na sandalan natin ay ang mga ebidensya na hango sa pag imbestiga, pag aaral, awtopsiya at pag likum ng mga dokumento ng PAOFT at ng PAO.

Walang dahilan ang PAOFT, PAO, mga batang nabakunahan, magulang, netizens, taumbayan at nagmamalasakit na mga scientists at doctors para mag imbento ng findings o data.

Sino ang mas may dahilan para gumawa ng paglilihis at pagkukubli?

Source: Rolaiza Mimi Singayao

Read Expert disagrees with Dr. Halstead after underestimating Dengvaxia deaths: 34 deaths is never acceptable!

Hello dear avid readers! What are your thoughts on this? Please let us know on the comments section below as we would love to hear it. Also, please share the article for more of this. We appreciate your support with us and may you continue to do such by visiting our page more often. Thank you so much!


Love this article? Please like our Facebook page below and Share this article to your friends!


We would love to hear your thoughts. Please share your comments below: